Vol2 Paper 18

posted Aug 24, 2018, 7:42 AM by Yaseen Raouf Mohammed   [ updated Sep 4, 2018, 2:08 AM ]

 Dindar S. Bari

 Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Zakho, Zakho, Kurdistan region, Iraq.

 Haval Y. Yacoob Aldosky

 Department of Physics, College of Science, University of Duhok, Duhok, Kurdistan region, Iraq.

Electrodermal activity (EDA) is a sensitive measure of sympathetic nervous system activity. It is used to describe changes in the skin electrical properties. This review aimed to show advantages of simultaneously recordings EDA parameters at the same skin site over other recordings. The literature databases Science Web, Google Scholar was searched using terms ‘electrodermal activity’, ‘sequentially recording’, ‘simultaneously recording’, ‘skin conductance’, ‘skin potential’, and ‘skin susceptance’. Articles that include sequentially and/or simultaneously recording EDA parameters were analyzed. The review presents a description of the oldest and current methods used for recording EDA parameters and an explanation of the newest techniques used in EDA researches. Although sequentially recordings are predominant and wide spread, much effort have been made to simultaneously record skin conductance (SC) and skin potential (SP), and recently researchers realized capability of simultaneously recording SC, SP, and skin susceptance (SS) at the same skin site. The advantage of simultaneous over the sequence measurements is that the latter must be manually time realigned when measured by different instruments which means time consuming. Although the simultaneous measurements are used exclusively for research purposes at this stage, this may open horizons in the modern trends of psychophysiology applications in the near future.

Skin, EDA, simultaneously SC and SP, skin conductance, skin potential. EDA parameters.

[1] Agache, P., Humber, P. [2004], Measuring the Skin: Non-invasive Investigation, Physiology, Normal Constants ed M Philipp, Springer, Berlin.
[2] Alaoui-Ismailim O., Vernet-Maury, E., Dittmar, A., Delhomme, G. and Chanel, J. [1997], ‘Odor hedonics: connection with emotional response estimated by autonomic parameters’, Chemical senses 22, 237-248.
[3] Bari D. S., Yacoob, H. Y., Tronstad, C., Kalvøy, H. and Martinsen, Ø. G. [2017], ‘Electrodermal responses to discrete stimuli measured by skin conductance, skin potential and skin susceptance’, manuscript submitted for publication. 200
[4] Benedek, M. and Kaernbach, C. [2010], ‘Decomposition of skin conductance data by means of nonnegative deconvolution’, Psychophysiology 47, 647-658.
[5] Boucsein, W. [2012], Electrodermal activity, Springer Science & Business Media, New York.
[6] Burstein, K. R., Fenz, W. D., Bergeron, J. and Epstein, S. [1965], ‘A comparison of skin potential and skin resistance responses as measures of emotional responsivity’, Psychophysiology 2, 14-24.
[7] Collet, C., Vernet-Maury, E., Delhomme, G. and Dittmar, A. [1997], ‘Autonomic nervous system response patterns specificity to basic emotions’, Journal of the autonomic nervous system 62, 45-57.
[8] Darrow, C. W. [1964], ‘The rationale for treating the change in galvanic skin response as a change in conductance’, Psychophysiology 1, 31-38.
[9] Dawson, M. E. , Schell, A. M. and Filion, D. L. [2007], The electrodermal system, In: Handbook of psychophysiology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 200-223.
[10] Edelberg, R. [1967], Electrical properties of the skin, Methods in psychophysiology, pp. 1-53.
[11] Edelberg, R. [1971], Electrical properties of skin. In H. R. Elden [Ed.], A treatise of the skin [Biophysical properties of the skin, Vol. 1, pp. 519–551], Wiley, New York.
[12] Edelberg, R. [1972], Electrical activity of the skin: Its measurement and uses in psychophysiology, Handbook of psychophysiology, pp. 12-1011.
[13] Edelberg, R. [1993], Electrodermal mechanisms: A critique of the two-effector hypothesis and a proposed replacement, In: Progress in electrodermal research, pp. 7-29.
[14] Edelberg, R. and Burch, N. R. [1962], ‘Skin Resistance and Galvanic Skin Response: Influence of Surface Variables, and Methodological Implications’, Archives of general psychiatry 7, 163-169.
[15] Fowles, D. C. [1986], ‘The eccrine system and electrodermal activity’, Psychophysiology: Systems, processes, and applications, 1, 51-96.
[16] Fowles, D. C., Christie, M. J., Edelberg, R., Grings, W. W., Lykken, D. T. and Venables, P. H. [1981], ‘Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements’, Psychophysiology 18, 232-239.
[17] Gaviria, B., Coyne, L. and Thetford, P. E. [1969], ‘Correlation of skin potential and skin resistance measures’, Psychophysiology 5, 465-477. 201
[18] Greco, A., Lanata, A., Valenza, G., Rota, G., Vanello, N. and Scilingo, E. On the deconvolution analysis of electrodermal activity in bipolar patients, In: Engineering in medicine and biology society, 2012 annual international conference of the ieee [2012], IEEE, 6691-6694.
[19] Greco, A., Valenza, G., Lanata, A., Rota, G. and Scilingo, E. P. [2014], ‘Electrodermal activity in bipolar patients during affective elicitation’, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 18, 1865-1873.
[20] Greco, A., Valenza, G. and Scilingo, E. P. [2016], Advances in Electrodermal Activity Processing with Applications for Mental Health: From Heuristic Methods to Convex Optimization, Springer, Cham.
[21] Grimnes, S. [1982], ‘Psychogalvanic reflex and changes in electrical parameters of dry skin’, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 20, 734-740.
[22] Grimnes, S., Jabbari, A., Martinsen, Ø. G. and Tronstad, C. [2011], ‘Electrodermal activity by DC potential and AC conductance measured simultaneously at the same skin site’, Skin Research and Technology, 17, 26-34.
[23] Grimnes, S. and Martinsen, Ø. G. [2015], Bioimpedance and Bioelectricity Basics, 3rd Edition, Academic Press, Oxford.
[24] Hunter, E. J,, Johnson, L. C. and Keefe, F. B. [1972], ‘Electrodermol and cardiovascular responses in nonreaders’, Journal of Learning Disabilities 5, 187-197.
[25] Hupka, R. B. and Levinger, G. [1967], ‘Within‐subject correspondence between skin conductance and skin potential under conditions oe activity and passivity’, Psychophysiology, 4, 161-167.
[26] Jabbari, A., Grimnes, S. and Martinsen, Ø. G. Electrodermal response–correlation between potential and conductance, In: 13th International conference on electrical bioimpedance and the 8th conference on electrical impedance tomography [2007], Springer, pp. 747-750.
[27] Jabbari, A., Johnsen, B., Grimnes, S. and Martinsen, Ø. G. Simultaneous measurement of skin potential and conductance in electrodermal response monitoring, In: Journal of Physics: conference series [2010], Vol 1. IOP Publishing, p 012091.
[28] Kajiwara, S. [2014], ‘Evaluation of driver’s mental workload by facial temperature and electrodermal activity under simulated driving conditions’, International Journal of Automotive Technology 15, 65-70.
[29] Lykken, D., Miller, R. and Strahan, R. [1968], ‘Some properties of skin conductance and potential’, Psychophysiology 5, 253-268.
[30] Lykken, D. T. and Venables, P. H. [1971], ‘Direct measurement of skin conductance: A pro202 posal for standardization’, Psychophysiology 8, 656-672.
[31] Martin, I. [1980], Techniques in psychophysiology, Vol 6, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
[32] Montagu, J. [1958], ‘The psycho-galvanic reflex a comparison of ac skin resistance and skin potential changes’, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 21, 119-128.
[33] Neumann, E. and Blanton, R. [1970], ‘The early history of electrodermal research’, Psychophysiology 6, 453-475.
[34] Pabst, O., Tronstad, C., Grimnes, S., Fowles, D. and Martinsen, Ø. G. [2016], ‘Comparison between the AC and DC measurement of electrodermal activity’, Psychophysiology 54, 374- 385.
[35] Patterson, T. and Venables, P. H. [1978], ‘Bilateral skin conductance and skin potential in schizophrenic and normal subjects: The identification of the fast habituator group of schizophrenics’, Psychophysiology 15, 556-560.
[36] Qiao, Z-G. , Mørkrid, L. and Grimnes, S. [1987], ‘Simultaneous measurement of electrical admittance, blood flow and temperature at the same skin site with a specially designed probe’, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 25, 299-304.
[37] Roth, W. T., Dawson, M. E. and Filion, D. L. [2012], ‘Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements’, Psychophysiology 49, 1017-1034.
[38] Scerbo, A. S., Freedman, L. W., Raine, A., Dawson, M. E. and Venables, P. H. [1992], ‘A major effect of recording site on measurement of electrodermal activity’, Psychophysiology 29, 241-246.
[39] Serup, J., Jemec, G. B. and Grove, G. L. [2006], Handbook of non-invasive methods and the skin, CRC press, Boca Raton.
[40] Shiihara, Y., Umezawa, A., Sakai, Y., Kamitamari, N. and Kodama, M. [2000], ‘Continuous recordings of skin conductance change during sleep’, Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences 54, 268-269.
[41] Shira, K., Yamamoto, Y., Nakamura, T. and Kusuhara, T. ‘Formative mechanism of skin potential activity and relationships between skin potential and skin impedance’, In: World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering’ [2006-2007], Springer, pp. 2694- 2697.
[42] Tronstad, C., Gjein, G. E., Grimnes, S., Martinsen, Ø. G., Krogstad, A-L. and Fosse, E. [2008] ‘Electrical measurement of sweat activity’, Physiological measurement 29, 407-415. 203
[43] Tronstad, C., Grimnes, S., Martinsen, Ø. G., Amundsen, V. and Wojniusz, S. ‘PC-based instrumentation for electrodermal activity measurement’, In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series [2010], Vol 1. IOP Publishing, p 012093.
[44] Tronstad, C., Kalvøy, H., Grimnes, S. and Martinsen, Ø. G. [2013], ‘Improved estimation of sweating based on electrical properties of skin’, Annals of biomedical engineering 41, 1074- 1083.
[45] Tronstad, C., Kalvøy, H., Grimnes, S. and Martinsen, Ø. G. [2013], ‘Waveform difference between skin conductance and skin potential responses in relation to electrical and evaporative properties of skin’, Psychophysiology 50, 1070-1078.
[46] Turpin, G. and Siddle, D. A. [1979], ‘Effects of stimulus intensity on electrodermal activity’, Psychophysiology 16, 582-591.
[47] Venables, P. and Martin, I. [1967], ‘The relation of palmar sweat gland activity to level of skin potentialand conductance’, Psychophysiology 3, 302-311.
[48] Venables, P. and Sayer, E. [1963], ‘On the measurement of the level of skin potential’, British Journal of Psychology 54, 251-260.
[49] Venables, P. H. and Christie, M. J. [1980], Electrodermal activity, In I. Martin & O. Venables [Eds.], Techniques in psychophysiology, pp. 3-6, NY: Wiley & Sons, New York.
[50] Wilcott, R. [1958], ‘Correlation of skin resistance and potential’, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology 51, 691-696.
[51] Williamson, P. S., Fowles, D. C. and Weinberger, M. [1985], ‘Electrodermal potential and conductance measurements clinically discriminate between cystic fibrosis and control patients’, International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc., 19, 810-814.
[52] Yokota, T., Takahashi, T., Kondo, M. and Fujimori, B. [1959], ‘Studies on the diphasic wave form of the galvanic skin reflex’, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology 11, 687-696.

View All Artical